chorasimilarity

This is a 2026 update of The Internet can be your pet (2015), produced by Qwen 3.6.

This answers to the update put on top of A Directed Interaction Combinators Challenge.

Continuing The unfolding story of Symplectic Bipotentials, further exchanges with the editor-in-chief of the journal Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, part of Sage Publishing, resulted in the following surprising outcome about the article [1] which pla…

UPDATE: The challenge holds, but it is more funny that is suggested here.

I remembered this and thought is important to mention, for the readers who are bored by the dispute around symplectic bipotentials.

UPDATE 26 Mar 2026: Continues with Symplectic bipotentials: the letter of the editor-in-chief This post is made to host the discussion after the stage where the expert of the MMS journal writes that I’m right, but on the other side the report makes many v…

This post continues The unfolding story of Symplectic Bipotentials.

Right after I wrote Enough fun: conclusion, an unexpected sequence of updates appeared, around the publication of the article Symplectic bipotentials on 03 Feb 2026, by the journal Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, a part of Sage Publishing, which plag…

Edit Feb 22 2026: The many updates to this post, including links and quotes, moved to the next, more recent The unfolding story of Symplectic Bipotentials.

COMMENT: This subject appeared here in several places, among them the post Curvdimension and curvature of a metric profile III.

UPDATE: There is now a 4th post along the same ideas described here.

UPDATE/COMMENT: The inequality from section 6.3 is the most interesting, but in my opinion the geometrical idea is not well understood.

(updates are at the bottom of the page) Read also The unfolding story of Symplectic bipotentials.

Based on: M.

Some recent posts here were reverted to draft and a better version is to be found elsewhere.

Required reading: In [3] is thrown a challenge, to make Chemical Joy or chemJoy, which would be the “chem-” equivalent of Joy (or FORTH).

UPDATE: Has door UPDATE: New logo, less verbose: ________________ After my first call for a Random Asymmetric Asemantic Research lab, the RAAR lab appeared and is now under development.

UPDATE: A truly local version as part of my homepage.

Here the content of the post Same thing is reframed in hexagon style.

In A shuffle rewrite in the limit was proposed a modification of the SH24 rewrite, in the sense that the LHS pattern transforms into the RHS pattern where the one of the common edge decorations changes.

Or how is the S combinator a kind of hexagonal rewrite?

Readers may be interested about this update of the AI Senescence page: As pointed in the 2015′ Artificial life, standard computation tests and validation we add here the first times when the subject of AI senescence appears related to chemlambda.

This is an update of my post from a year ago Sometimes parasites of Open Science can’t do anything without the host.

In the post A hexagonal move which is not DIST or SHUFFLE we saw a rewrite which is a sort of a shuffle, but not the usual one.

Almost two years ago, in the post Asemantic computing wins?

The hexagon bipartite graph appears last time in the post The hexagram of hexagonal rewrites, where the first picture is: All the nodes of this hexagram are hexagon bipartite graphs (with 3 white nodes and 3 black nodes) and moreover with a partition of t…

As a support of my previous post AI Senescence, 8 months later, I asked Grok.

UPDATE (24.09.2025): See the more recent AI Senescence vs Ruliology of lambdas, for similarities and differences, (as) perceived (even) by Grok.

With some delay I processed the very sad news about Charlie Kirk.

Probably related to I Ching.

Well, at the level of decorations it is a shuffle, but in a subtle way.

UPDATE (feb. 2026): From this news release here is a Report of the Committee on the Judiciary of the U.S.

There are 20 hexagonal moves, ie 20 ways to partition the hexagon (“FO” should read “FOX”) or if you want with colors into two subsets of three nodes.

There is a new theory of derivative algebras (name may change), which is alternative to emergent algebras.

We present the shuffle deviation as a partial solution to the problem described in A notation for chora and derivative.

Continues after Same thing seen before: the derivative of a function is a chora of a term.

There are discussions these days which led me to the work of Andrzej Łobaczewski on political ponerology.

There is no algorithm which, fed with a molecule (ie mol file), would answer in finite time if the molecule evolves to a quine or not.

Let’s just copypaste the hypothesis of the calculator: “Based on empirical observations, we propose the hypothesis: (Δ t-historic) = (Δ t-today)^(log 5/ log 2) where the Δ t-historic is the time in decades from the invention of the printing press and Δ t-…

It happened that in the realm of geometry and calculus in metric spaces (a very modern research field) I found [1] , [2] , [3] that there was some abstract approach which gives not only the fundamentals of the field, but also the way to prove the results.

When we (ie I and Louis Kauffman) worked on the GLC actors model, we were, or rather I was more naive about the original Hewitt Actor model.

Dedicated to Louis Kauffman.

In the post ChemSKI not Nock from 2021 I give a telegra.ph link to some comments on the Urbit whitepaper.

The RAAR lab is presently a virtual lab hosted by the Institute of Mathematics of the Romanian Academy (IMAR).

Without further ado, I asked GROK to summarize the text contained in Buliga, Marius (2023).

UPDATE (feb 2026): I corrected the title from “the derivative of a function is a chora…” to “the derivative of a functions and a chora…” I want to refresh the memory as concerns the first drawing in Same thing, by pointing that you have seen those before.

I made the page GLC-Grok story where I reproduce the episodes and epilogue done with the help of Grok, which mix GLC actors with Neal Stephenson, Elon Musk and Marcel Proust.

UPDATE: Wonderful things to come, for which I don’t have names, about new subjects.

UPDATE[08.2025]: I understand now Trump policy as the establishment of a new feudal system, where there is a hierachy of countries, a tree with the USA at the root and edges representing one country being a vassal to another.

These knot sigils have no a priori reasons to give the same thing, look: