Wellformedness

Years ago I saw Nic Danis present an interesting paper where he used relatively simple proofs to demonstrate that two different types of feature systems (one SPE-like , one with a special place node) defined the same inventory of segments, but different s…

Almost two years ago we announced UDTube, our neural morphological analyzer.

An unlikely series confusions and mismaps in my early career resulted in my brief involvement with the forced alignment-industrial complex.

I recently saw a talk where the speaker was endorsing construction grammar (which type, I’m not sure) and in particular, a view of language as “constructions all the way down”.

Twelve years ago I wrote a bit about Pynchon’s use of eye dialect in his underappreciated 2013 novel Bleeding Edge.

Since I started grad school, I have made a practice of reading books, and pop-science linguistics books in particular.

My university’s library has issues of many older journals currently only available on microfiche, which are 4×6″ sheets of film used to store analogue copies of pages.

In the last few years, I have seen a number of talks and papers which tested for an effect of sonority sequencing on various phenomena, either synchronic or diachronic.

In the last two years or so I have gradually transitioned away from experimental-behavioral and computational work towards a larger proportion of what used to be called “pencil-and-paper” research: the development of theories, formalisms, and analyses.

In his Phonology of Italian, Krämer (2009:§4.2.1) is interested in the productivity of velar palatlization before /i/-initial suffixes, such as the masculine noun plural /-i/.