Creează un cont pentru a te abona la acest blog și a-i urmări articolele pe pagina Lectură.
-
Good customer / problem discovery is key to achieving problem/solution fit.
-
As product development has become easier, the battle for attention has become harder.
-
Inspired by Kurt Vonnegut’s lecture on “the simple shapes of stories,” I’ve previously riffed on The Simple Shapes of Startups.
-
Time flies.
-
Were you in the middle of launching a new product or startup when the pandemic hit?
-
Getting to product/market fit (aka the inflection point in the hockey-stick curve when a product's traction starts rapidly growing) is one of the most significant milestones for a startup.
-
While you need milestones to be well-defined, how one actually achieves them may not necessarily be well-defined or linear, but iterative…
-
Hopefully, the takeaway from this piece is getting others to think of goals the way you are advocating.
-
Successful businesses are more alike than unalike.
-
Alex Taylor — There’s a whole course on this (BOOTSTART) at https://leanstack.com/entrepreneur that dives into how to run interviews, capture insights, and position a product for switch.
-
Simplicity is deliberate here. 55 models, while exhaustive, can lead to analysis paralysis.
-
So even ERP is dependent on the same dynamics of users creating value and buyers/decision makers realizing that value over time.
-
Agreed.
-
A thorough problem discovery phase can take anywhere from 2–6 weeks which is why I don’t opt for it…
I instead, recommend making a case for customer/problem fit first using a Lean(er) Canvas backed with some evidence.
-
First, this article was written for entrepreneurs swinging for the fences, not consultants.
-
Thanks for sharing… Free days are key and yes, there’s, unfortunately, a lot of stigma around them.
-
Time is our scarcest resource.
-
The traditional startup funnel is broken.
-
Link fixed.
-
Time flies.
-
If you’re a long time reader of this blog, chances are high you’ve read my first book: Running Lean.
-
Customer segmentation is always challenging… With larger orgs that have existing customers, I initially suggest segmenting your customers by metrics (e.g. best customers) and or specific jobs-to-be-done.
-
Are you talking about customer/user targets within the same business model or across multiple business models?
-
You got it — a jtbd is an instance of a class that’s an existing pattern that continually plays out…
You got it — a jtbd is an instance of a class that’s an existing pattern that continually plays out statistically in the same way…until something better comes along.
-
My point with those examples is that given a similar set of circumstances, different innovators can choose to focus on different contexts…
-
We met several years ago and started a collaboration where he admitted that the current jtbd thinking was too complex and he was seeking…
-
Practice Trumps Theory does not imply theory is irrelevant.
-
There is a lot to unpack here, but I’ll start with the comment about only focusing on first purchases — and not repurchases.
-
I’ll ask a different question on naming — because naming matters:
-
I’m a “Practice Trumps Theory” type of person.
-
Sorry… “JTBD as a job someone is trying to do” is not a definition.
-
We sometimes call the latent jtbd the non-consumption market because it seems like people aren’t taking action…when in fact, they aren’t…
-
An instantiation is not fuzzy but a discrete event.
-
I’m working on a next book ;)
-
Bob Moesta describes acquisition as the big hire and retention as the little hire.
-
John Morris Ah… that’s because we already have a system view of the customer journey — the customer…
John Morris Ah… that’s because we already have a system view of the customer journey — the customer factory blueprint.
-
but yes that’s a crucial point.
-
This post was all about definitions.
-
You’ve probably run into the jobs-to-be-done framework/theory.
-
http://innovatorsgift.com
-
In a recent post, I shared a reference implementation of an innovation funnel built on the Continuous Innovation Framework and cautioned…
-
Tristan Kromer — I almost called our conversation out in this other post: What is the Right Fill Order for a Lean Canvas?
-
The Model-Prioritize-Test pattern is rooted in the Scientific method.
-
The three circles are definitely generic and broad which isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
-
In order to achieve breakthrough innovation, you shouldn’t be limiting yourself to any one of these frameworks, but rather using all…
-
Be careful though, that simply listing a job-to-be-done is subject to the same bias as listing problems.
-
Here, I tend to disagree.
-
Sudhir Nain Have you checked out the Customer Forces Canvas?
-
I started a new project (http://innovatorsgift.com) to reconcile a lot of the existing and often conflicting approaches to JTBD.
-
It is feasible provided your initial problems are grounded in some learning e.g. anecdotal observation.