Tom Passarelli's Blog

The project did not start as a Kanata fork.

Framework note: This essay applies the carry-through criterion to software configuration.

Games are not simulations of meaning.

The enemy is not failure.

Not all states are equivalent from the perspective of the running itself.

The question “how does agency arise from non-agentive matter?”

This is not an argument.

Formal systems are missing a validation layer between syntax and execution.

The earlier essays identified a real boundary condition, but they placed it one step too late.

Extending the Consistency Gate The Consistency Gate (Passarelli 2026) specifies a validator V₁ that catches substrate-cancellation: premise sets containing {φ, ¬φ} are identified, returned as diagnostic objects, and removed before the inference engine fir…

Framework note: This essay is an application of the role-arity diagnostic to social infrastructure.

Framework note: This essay is about what happens when effort is structurally prevented from carrying through.

Editor’s note: This essay predates Running Comes First and uses an earlier consistency/invariance-first framing.

Framework note: This essay applies the full arity triad to employment structure.

Editor’s note: This essay predates Running Comes First but has been revised into alignment with its process-first framing.

Editor’s note: This essay predates Running Comes First and originally framed invariance as primitive.