StealthyCoder

In the previous article I reasoned that we might not need biology for the filter to work that will convert consciousness as potential energy into experienced consciousness.

Recently I wrote about a framework that I arrived at independently from a researcher through curiosity and asking questions and having a conversation with Claude.

What I was curious about was how did my thoughts map to the ancient (and not so ancient) philosophers.

This is taken out of another article.

I recently read somewhere some comment that someone said Claude Fable 5 was even more obnoxious in it's answers than Opus 4.8 was.

My CTO mentioned a statement during his short talk about AI, which was: “Think about it like exchanging energy for outcome.”

So in the previous article I was mentioning the tool is only as good as the experience and relevant skill of the person wielding the tool.

Like anything and everything everywhere concerning artisanal skills, or practical skills in general it is not the tool that is the problem but the person using it.

This is mostly done for posterity's sake.

I recently started to think about my workflows and UI aesthetics and I wanted to try Hyprland again .