Recreation Law

If it is foreseeable, then you need to understand and know it because that is part of the proof that might help you lose a lawsuit.

Negligently Luring Bears – Colorado C.R.S. § 33-6-131 Colorado law regulates the intentional placement of food or edible waste in the open when the purpose is to lure a wild bear.

Mississippi Rep Agreements – Contracts Between Out-of-State Principals and Commissioned Sales Representatives (§§ 75-87-1 — 75-87-7) Chapter 87.

Kansas Rep Law – Commission Salespersons (§§ 44-341 — 44-347) 44-342.

10-1-700 Definitions.

To See a Review of this case go to: Plaintiff assumed the risk walking behind an Airbnb and not following the trail.

Airbnb did not possess the land Hlad v.

Joe’s acceptance speech was awesome.

Unwritten rules of surfing etiquette are not rules of surfing.

For a review of this decision see: Surfboarder who cut off another Surfboarder already in the wave is protected by the defense of Primary Assumption of the Risk Olson v.

1.

Plaintiff was part of a team-building group for her school/employer, she fell off the balance beam and sued for her injuries.

To Read an Analysis of this decision see: After this decision, I’m not sure you could prove assumption of the risk without a written document and a video or more.

However, there is an inference from the interviews that is incorrect.

Unless listed here, your state does not allow a parent or guardian to sign away a minor’s right to sue.

Mother signed her son up for a trip and claimed she signed the release.

Bonnen v.

If you are on Federal land or Federal water making money you have to have a Federal Permit United States v.

To Read an Analysis of this decision see: Defendant found criminal guilty for failing to have a federal permit to operate on a lake owned by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, v.

US Army Corp of Engineers Land Use Regulations § 327.0 Applicability. 2 § 327.1 Policy. 2 § 327.2 Vehicles. 3 § 327.3 Vessels. 3 § 327.4 Aircraft. 4 § 327.5 Swimming. 5 § 327.6 Picnicking. 5 § 327.7 Camping. 5 § 327.8 Hunting, fishing, and trapping. 6 § 3…

The issue revolved around the authority of one brother to sign the electronic release on behalf of the other brother.

To Read an Analysis of this decision see: Release validity was based on whether brother had authorized brother to sign electronic release for him.

Recreation Law logo Indemnification agreements in releases fail.

To Read an Analysis of this decision see: New Jersey ski area pushes “indemnification” clause in release too far and gets told by court its release is an adhesion contract.

New Jersey Ski Statute, (N.J.S.A.) 5:13-1.