Iris van Rooij

I wrote the below email, when invited to review a paper that was partially processed by ChatGPT.

Marcela Suarez, Olivia Guest and I co-organise a Summer School Critical AI Literacies for Resisting and Reclaiming, June 22-26, 2026, at Radboud University, in The Netherlands.

Occasionally, I make threads on social media about papers and books that I read.

Waardengedreven AI betekent ook eerlijk erkennen welke schade de hype rondom AI technologieën doet, in de wetenschap en in de maatschappij, zowel de afgelopen jaren als de komende jaren.

Cite as: van Rooij, I. (2025) AI slop and the destruction of knowledge. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16905560 This week I was looking for info on what cognitive scientists mean when they speak of ‘domain-general’ cognition.

Perhaps one of the most persistent myths in science—one that also pervades public perception of science—is that it provides a value-free method to arrive at objective Truth, with a big ‘T’.

Here, I compile a set of videos that complement a course on computational complexity for cognitive scientists that I co-teach with Nils Donselaar.

Have you heard these claims?

Here I collect a selected set of critical lenses on so-called1 ‘AI’, including the recently hyped ChatGPT.

Cite as: van Rooij, I. (2023) Stop feeding the hype and start resisting. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16608308 Three weeks ago, I wrote a blogpost about how ChatGPT is a “stochastic parrot” (a term coined by Bender, Gebru, McMillan-Major, & Shmitchell,…