Creează un cont pentru a te abona la acest blog și a-i urmări articolele pe pagina Lectură.
-
In this post, we derive the exact equation for the quantile absolute deviation around the median of the Normal distribution.
-
This post proposes the standard quantile absolute deviation (SQAD) — a dispersion estimator with 54% Gaussian efficiency and 32% breakdown point, sitting between MAD and the Shamos estimator in the efficiency-robustness trade-off.
-
This post derives the asymptotic Gaussian efficiency of the quantile absolute deviation as a function of its quantile level.
-
This post evaluates the finite-sample Gaussian efficiency of the Rousseeuw–Croux $S_n$ and $Q_n$ estimators.
-
This post documents when MAD breaks down: heavy-tailed distributions, multimodal data, and large outlier contamination.
-
This post announces the preprint on finite-sample bias-correction factors for MAD based on the Harrell-Davis quantile estimator.
-
Change point detection is a popular task in various disciplines.
-
We consider the following dynamical system: $$ \begin{cases} \dot{x}_1 = L(a_1, k_1, x_3) - k_1 x_1,\\ \dot{x}_2 = L(a_2, k_2, x_1) - k_2 x_2,\\ \dot{x}_3 = L(a_3, k_3, x_2) - k_3 x_3, \end{cases} $$ where $L$ is a piecewise linear function: $$ L(a, k, x)…
-
This post introduces the “degenerate point” — the fraction of tied values at which a dispersion estimator collapses to zero — as a metric for comparing robustness to ties.
-
This post introduces the untied quantile absolute deviation — a modification of QAD that never collapses to zero on samples with tied values.
-
In one of the previous posts, I described the idea of the middle non-zero quantile absolute deviation.
-
Let’s consider a discrete distribution $X$ defined by its probability mass function $p_X(x)$.
-
In the previous post, we discussed the Gastwirth’s location estimator.
-
This post studies Gastwirth’s location estimator — a weighted sum of three quantiles designed for robustness.
-
Let’s consider the following dynamical system: $$ \begin{cases} \dot{x}_1 = f(x_3) - x_1,\\ \dot{x}_2 = f(x_1) - x_2,\\ \dot{x}_3 = f(x_2) - x_3, \end{cases} $$ where $f(x) = \alpha / (1+x^m)$ is a Hill function.
-
In this post, I use Beeping Busy Beavers to show that twin prime conjecture could be proven or disproven.
-
This post introduces the Hodges–Lehmann–Sen shift estimator for the location difference between two samples, together with confidence intervals built via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test inversion.
-
This post extends the efficiency study of the Hodges–Lehmann estimator to various light-tailed and heavy-tailed distributions.
-
This post evaluates the relative efficiency of the Hodges–Lehmann estimator against the sample median under the normal distribution.
-
Let $X_1, X_2$ be i.i.d. random variables that follow the standard normal distribution $\mathcal{N}(0,1^2)$.
-
Let $X_1, X_2$ be i.i.d. random variables that follow the standard normal distribution $\mathcal{N}(0,1^2)$.
-
This post derives the exact analytical bias-correction factor for MAD with $n = 2$.
-
In this post, I combine ideas from two of my previous posts: Trimmed Harrell-Davis quantile estimator: quantile estimator that provides an optimal trade-off between statistical efficiency and robustness Weighted quantile estimators: a general scheme that…
-
The Mann–Whitney U test is one of the most popular nonparametric null hypothesis significance tests.
-
In the previous post, I discussed different fence-based outlier detectors.
-
In previous posts, I discussed properties of Tukey’s fences and asymmetric decile-based outlier detector (Part 1, Part 2).
-
Since the beginning of previous year, I have been working on building a quantile estimator that provides an optimal trade-off between statistical efficiency and robustness.
-
In the previous post, I suggested an asymmetric decile-based outlier detector as an alternative to Tukey’s fences.
-
In the previous post, I covered some problems with the outlier detector based on Tukey fences.
-
Tukey’s fences is one of the most popular simple outlier detectors for one-dimensional number arrays.
-
This post replaces MAD with the middle non-zero QAD in the gamma effect size formula to handle discrete distributions with ties.
-
This post introduces the middle non-zero quantile absolute deviation (MNZQAD) as a scale measure robust to ties in discrete distributions.
-
This post derives MAD bias-correction factors using the trimmed Harrell-Davis quantile estimator, refining finite-sample behaviour further.
-
This post compares MAD and the Shamos estimator across various distributions and sample sizes.
-
In the previous posts, I discussed [[p2-quantile-estimator-intro]] (a sequential estimator which takes $O(1)$ memory and estimates a single predefined quantile), the moving P² quantile estimator ([[mp2-quantile-estimator]]) (a moving modification of P² wh…
-
I already covered the P² quantile estimator and its possible implementation improvements in several blog posts.
-
I have already written a few blog posts about the P² quantile estimator (which is a sequential estimator that uses $O(1)$ memory): [[p2-quantile-estimator]] [[p2-quantile-estimator-rounding-issue]] [[p2-quantile-estimator-initialization]] In this post, we…
-
Update: the estimator accuracy could be improved using a bunch of patches.
-
There are multiple ways to compute the “average” value of an array of numbers.
-
Let’s say we have a distribution $X$ that is given by its $s$-quantile values: $$ q_{X_1} = Q_X(p_1),\; q_{X_2} = Q_X(p_2),\; \ldots,\; q_{X_{s-1}} = Q_X(p_{s-1}) $$ where $Q_X$ is the quantile function of $X$, $p_j = j / s$.
-
Let’s say we have two distributions $X$ and $Y$.
-
Let’s say we have two distributions $X$ and $Y$, and we want to express the “absolute difference” between them.
-
Update: the final paper was published in Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation (DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2022.2050396).
-
Let’s consider the classic sample median.
-
I already discussed misleadingness of such metrics like standard deviation and skewness.
-
Skewness is a commonly used measure of the asymmetry of the probability distributions.
-
The Greenwald-Khanna quantile estimator is a classic sequential quantile estimator which has the following features: It allows estimating quantiles with respect to the given precision $\epsilon$.
-
Update: the estimator accuracy could be improved using a bunch of patches.
-
Traditional quantile estimators that are based on one or two order statistics are a common way to estimate distribution quantiles based on the given samples.
-
In the previous post, I discussed the problem of non-smooth quantile-respectful density estimation (QRDE) which is generated by the trimmed Harrell-Davis quantile estimator based on the highest density interval of the given width.