pigee

I’ve always liked power analysis.

Written by Brent Roberts and not ChatGTP.

Brent W.

An interesting little discussion popped up in the wild and wooly new media world in science (e.g., podcasts and twitter) concerning the relative merits of “descriptive” vs “hypothesis” driven designs.

Contributors to this blog (in alphabetical order a la the economists) David Condon, Chris Fraley, Katie Corker, Rodica Damian, M Brent Donnelan, Grant Edmonds, David Funder, Don Lynam, Dan Mroczek, Uli Orth, Alexander Schackman, Uli Schimmack, Chris Soto,…

How about a little blast from the past?

I seem to replicate the same conversation on Twitter every time a different sliver of the psychological guild confronts open science and reproducibility issues.

A while back, Michael Kraus (MK), Michael Frank (MF) and me (Brent W Roberts, or BWR; M.

There have been a slew of systematic replication efforts and meta-analyses with rather provocative findings of late.

At the end of my previous blog “Because, change is hard“, I said, and I quote: “So, send me your huddled, tired essays repeating the same messages about improving our approach to science that we’ve been making for years and I’ll post, repost, and blog abo…