Critical Fallibilism

The primary purpose of practicing ideas and skills is to enable your subconscious to do them.

Critical Fallibilism (CF) is a philosophy I developed which deals with rationality, knowledge, and critical thinking and discussion.

What should you have before a debate?

TristanTrim wrote on LessWrong (link added): I dislike "argument" and "debate" as contexts for discussing discourse.

Dennis Hackethal has been writing about Critical Fallibilism's (CF's) core ideas, on his Veritula website, but he doesn't name or credit CF or me.

How many think tanks or prestigious authors have a discussion forum?

A debate policy is a public document, written and posted in advance, which provides information about what issues you will debate, with who, using what debate methods.

I wrote a dense paragraph about Critical Fallibilism (CF), particularly ideas inspired by Eli Goldratt's Theory of Constraints (TOC).

Critical Fallibilism's (CF's) concept of error correction mechanisms helps people deal with fallibility.

One of the really hard problems in epistemology is about patterns.

This follows my article Learning and the Subconscious Bullet Points, in which I made the following claim (paraphrasing): Learning projects should generally be broken into parts which take at most a week to complete.

What problem is the theory of induction intended to solve?

My philosophy, Critical Fallibilism (CF), says that we should accept and act on only non-refuted ideas, and should reject refuted ideas.

Critical Fallibilism (CF) says to evaluate ideas as refuted or non-refuted using decisive, critical arguments.

What does being open to debate mean for a public intellectual?